|At a Glance|
|Product||D-Link Xtreme N Dual Band Gigabit Router (DIR-825)|
|Summary||Dual-band dual radio dual antenna Wi-Fi Certified 802.11n Draft 2.0 router based on Atheros XSPAN silicon|
|Pros|| Two radios for simultaneous dual-band operation
Gigabit WAN and LAN with > 300 Mbps routing spee
High simultaneous sessions
Automatic QoS for Internet uplink and WLAN
USB server for storage and printers
|Cons|| Unimpressive range, particularly 5 GHz|
D-Link has apparently decided to take another run at making a two radio, dual-band draft 802.11n router, given all the negative baggage that its late-to-the-market, expensive, still hard-to-find and poor-performing DIR-855 has acquired. The good news is that you can actually find the DIR-825. The bad is that its performance, particularly in the 5 GHz band, will probably cause many of them to go right back to the store.
What It Is
The 825 uses the same basic design that first appeared in the DGL-4500, i.e. Ubicom CPU, two mini-PCI board Atheros XSPAN radios and a four port gigabit switch. In fact, if you look at the larger version of Figure 1, you can see labeling in the lower left corner for the DIR-855, DIR-655, DIR-660 and DGL-4500. Note the heatsink on the gigabit switch and thermal pad on the Ubicom processor.
Figure 1: DIR-825 inside view
I already detailed the differences in between the 855 and 825 in this article. They boil down to using a Realtek RTL8366SR gigabit switch, instead of the Realtek RTL8356 in the 855 (both support up to 9k jumbo frames) and radios using Atheros' newer XSPAN AR9100 chipsets vs. the AR5008 chipsets in the 855. Both products are powered by a Ubicom IP5170U clocked at 350 MHz.
You might notice that D-Link has used the 855's case, with an empty middle hole for a third antenna. The photo also shows that the mini-PCI radios even have all three miniature connectors loaded. But if you want to try to turn an 825 into an 855, forget it. All the components required to combine the 2.4 and 5 GHz radio outputs aren't loaded. And you'd have to scare up an additional dual-band antenna, too.
I tested the 825 using the B1 hardware version of D-Link's Xtreme N Dual Band USB Adapter. The A1 version uses an Atheros AR9170 MAC/BB and AR9104 Dual-band 2x2 MIMO radio and, if you'll remember, delivered very poor performance when I tried it with the DIR-855. The B1 version shown in the not-so-great FCC photo in Figure 2 uses a Ralink RT2870F BB/MAC and RT2850L 2.4/5GHz 2T3R Transceiver.
Figure 2: D-Link DWA-160 B1 USB adapter board
Modes and channels are the same as the 855, but I'll repeat the information here for your convenience. Channels in the 5 GHz Lower (36, 40, 44, 48) and Upper (149, 153, 157, 161, 165) bands are available, whether or not you choose the Auto Channel Scan Wireless Channel option.
The 802.11 Mode selector provides just about all the options you would need to solve compatibility problems with "legacy" 802.11b/g clients. For 2.4 GHz you get:
- Mixed 802.11n, 802.11g and 802.11b (default)
- Mixed 802.11n and 802.11g
- Mixed 802.11n and 802.11b
- Mixed 802.11g and 802.11b
- 802.11n only
- 802.11g only
- 802.11b only
and for 5 GHz you get:
- Mixed 802.11n and 802.11a (default)
- 802.11n only
- 802.11a only
The Basic Wireless settings screen also provides access to Wireless Security settings, which include a full suite of WEP, WPA and WPA2 settings, with both "Personal" (PSK) and "Enterprise" (RADIUS) WPA/WPA2 modes. Security can be set separately for each radio.
I did a quick WPS pushbutton session check with the Ralink-based B1 version of D-Link's DWA-160 Xtreme N Dual Band USB Adapter —D-Link's only dual-band adapter. I reset the router to defaults to ensure that there were no settings that could prevent a successful WPS push-button session. Unfortunately, after multiple attempts, I could not get a connection via the WPS session.
Advanced Wireless controls are the same as the 855's and include High / Medium / Low transmit power and WLAN partitioning.
Average user rating from: 1 user(s)
NOTE! Please post product reviews from actual experience only.
Questions, review comments and opinions about products not based on actual use will not be published.
|User Rating [Back to Top]||Overall:||3.7||Features :||4.0||Performance :||4.0||Reliability :||3.0|
A Boat Anchor no more
May 17, 2010
Report this review
If you had asked me to review this before firmware 1.13 was available, I would have said Save Your Money, this thing is worth more as a boat anchor as the device was feature rich but was awful in the reliability area.
If D-link had not sat on responding to the horrible uptime issues of the earlier firmwares, I would have scored their reliability higher, but their customer treatment makes me question recommending or purchasing a D-Link branded product ever again.
Since firmware 1.13, this router has become as reliable as my original Linksys WRT54G. Unfortunately, I think that D-Link will forget about making any further improvements or fixes since the model B1 is all one can buy. Additionally, there are no alternative firmwares such as DD-WRT available for the A1 version.
As noted in the formal review, speeds are very good for LAN. My 5 GHz range is ok at best. You should expect it's range to be about half that of 2.4 GHz.
If the B1 can run Open Source Linux code such as DD-WRT and it's like reliably, I would recommend the B1 version since you can bail on D-Link's code base and use the code that others are maintaining. Just don't think you can depend on D-Link to keep pumping out fixes and updates, this is just not something in D-Link's history with this model.
Related Items:LAN Section
Contest #28 Results
Contest #26 Results
Contest #29 Results
WD Personal Cloud NAS Gets 4 TB Drives