Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

FastLane Performance

I also tested the EX6200's "FastLane" feature in both modes with surprising results. The first plot shows extended wireless throughput using the 2.4 GHz radio to connect back to the base router and the 5 GHz radio to connect to the extended test client. Since I measured 47 Mbps down and 54 Mbps uplink using the straight 5 GHz repeated signal, it looks like this FastLane mode isn't the way to go.

NETGEAR EX6200 extended throughput via FastLane w/ 2.4 GHz backhaul

NETGEAR EX6200 extended throughput via FastLane w/ 2.4 GHz backhaul

Switching over to using a 5 GHz backhaul looks more promising. The straight 2.4 GHz extended signal provided only 21 Mbps down and 26 Mbps up, while the FastLane extended signal yielded three times more downlink and almost two times more uplink throughput! So if you had an AC1200 or higher class router serving mostly 2.4 GHz clients, it looks like the EX6200 could put the idle 5 GHz radio to good use.

NETGEAR EX6200 extended throughput via FastLane w/ 5 GHz backhaul

NETGEAR EX6200 extended throughput via FastLane w/ 5 GHz backhaul

Signal Boost

So how much did the EX6200 actually boost the signal in our test setup? Glad you asked, because I took inSSIDer measurements to show just that. The 2.4 GHz plot below shows the EX6200 took an intermittent -88 dBm signal and boosted it to a continuous -43 dBm average signal.

inSSIDer plot of 2.4 GHz signal difference

inSSIDer plot of 2.4 GHz signal difference

The 5 GHz plot shows a similar story, with an intermittent -86 dBm signal turned into a much more reliable -41 dBm.

inSSIDer plot of 5 GHz signal difference

inSSIDer plot of 5 GHz signal difference

Closing Thoughts

There is still no substitute for the reliability and throughput that Ethernet-connected access points can provide for solving wireless coverage problems. But the EX6200 shows that the higher bandwidth afforded by 802.11ac technology can be a surprisingly good substitute. And much easier to set up, too!

While you can use the EX6200 with any router or AP, you'll get the best throughput by pairing it with an AC1200 or higher class router. As with any wireless extender, the more bandwidth it receives, the more it can pass along. For the EX6200, that "extended" bandwidth can be impressively high.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hi everyone.So we renovated the house a little while back but at that time the other half couldn't decide fully on layout so the cat 6 cable didn't ge...
I am setting up a AC68U for a client to be used as a WiFi extender. As I have 2 of the same routers I am very familiar with it set up and operation. E...
How can one delete routers and/or start over without uninstalling app?
Hi!My old wan-start worked fine. After updating to firmware .15 I renamed it to wan-event and adapted it to consider the new parameters. But it doesn'...
RT-AC68R with Merlin 384.13Recently installed latest shipping versions of Diversion and Skynet via AMTM (Awesome Tools!!!) and now I can no longer ssh...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3