NETGEAR ReadyNAS RN102 Reviewed

Photo of author

Tim Higgins

ReadyNAS 102
At a glance
Product NETGEAR ReadyNAS 102 (RN10200) [Website]
Summary Two bay Marvell-powered NAS with completely revamped OS based on BTRFS with built-in antivirus
Pros • Good balance of features, performance, price
• Built-in antivirus
• Cloud based replication, access, drop folder
Cons • Not the fastest for USB attached backup
• Some features not carried into new OS or require Genie Marketplace signup


The RN102 is the two-bay cousin to the four-bay RN104 reviewed in May. The differences, which are highlighted in the comparison table taken from both products’ web pages, boil down to two fewer drives, no LCD display and one less Gigabit Ethernet port on the RN102.

NETGEAR RN102 / RN104 compard

NETGEAR RN102 / RN104 compard

The RN102’s has the 104’s sturdy metal chassis, but its front cover is plastic and there is no carry handle on the back.

NETGEAR RN102 Front and rear panel callouts

NETGEAR RN102 Front and rear panel callouts

The callout diagram above shows the same eSATA, USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 ports, but only one Gigabit Ethernet LAN port.


It was a tad easier to extract the 102’s board from its case than the 104’s. You still need to remove the side covers and rear panel, which contains the single fan that plugs into the main board. The 1.2 GHz Marvell Armada 370 is under the heatsink in the photo below and you can see the flash, RAM and other devices.

NETGEAR ReadyNAS RN102 board

NETGEAR ReadyNAS RN102 board

The key components are summarized in Table 1 with the RN104’s for comparison

RN102 RN104
CPU Marvell Armada 370 @ 1.2 GHz Marvell Armada 370 @ 1.2 GHz
RAM 512 MB 512 MB
Flash 128 MB 128 MB
Ethernet Marvell 88E1318-NNB2 Marvell 88E1318-NNB2 (x2)
SATA Marvell 88SE9170 1 port PCIe 2.0 SATA Controller Marvell 88SE9215 4 port PCIe 2.0 SATA 6Gb/s and PATA Host Controller
USB 3.0 Fresco Logic FL1009 dual port PCI Express to USB 3.0 host controller Fresco Logic FL1009 dual port PCI Express to USB 3.0 host controller
Table 1: Key component summary and comparison

NETGEAR supplied an RN10200 diskless model for review, so two Western Digital Red 3TB drives (WD30EFRX) were added for testing. Power consumption measured 16 W with the two drives spun up. I couldn’t measure power consumption with the drives spun down because idle drive spindown still isn’t supported in the 6.0.8 firmware used for review. Fan and drive noise were classified as very-low; I really had to strain to hear it in my quiet home office, even when under load during testing.


The RN102 runs NETGEAR’s new OS 6, which was already reviewed in detail. The 102 has all the features of the 104, but doesn’t support RAID modes higher than 1.


We tested with 6.0.8 firmware using our standard NAS test process using RAID 0 and 1 volumes. Time to completely build and resync a 2 x 3 TB RAID 1 volume was just under 10 hours. Time until the volume was ready for use, although at reduced performance during the rebuild, was under a minute.

The Benchmark Summary below shows that reads are faster than writes for both the Windows File Copy and NASPT File Copy methods that measure large file copy performance. The difference is almost 2-to-1 for the Windows File Copy method, which acutally uses a folder of 38 files. The NASPT File Copy method, which uses a single 1.3 GB file, showed only about an 8 MB/s read advantage.

NETGEAR RN102 Benchmark Summary

NETGEAR RN102 Benchmark Summary

Turning to the NAS Ranker for the rest of the analysis, the RN102 ranked #6 among SoC-1 (single-core application-specific) class processors, which is the class for Marvell SoC’s. If we look at the ranking for just two-bay products, the RN102 ranks fourth.

Digging into the detail provided by the Ranker Performance Summary below, we see the RN102 is strongest in the Video and iSCSI benchmarks. Its weakest performances were in RAID 0 NASPT Directory Copy write (2.9 MB/s) and read (9.5 MB/s).

NETGEAR RN102 NAS Ranker Performance Detail

NETGEAR RN102 NAS Ranker Performance Detail

For backup, the USB 2.0 / NTFS combination wasn’t particularly impressive at just shy of 9 MB/s. But it did pretty well with rsync network backup with 27 MB/s for a #3 rank in this class.

Closing Thoughts

Although the RN102 ranks #6 among all 23 SoC-1 class NASes currently in the charts, that ranking changes to #4 out of 11 when you consider only two-bay models. Its pricing, at around $180 as I write this, is the same as the #1 ranked SoC-1 ZyXEL NSA325 and older #7 ranked QNAP TS-212. So you’re not going to over pay for all the features that ReadyNAS OS 6 brings to the table.

With its balance of features, performance and price, the ReadyNAS 102 should make its way onto the short list of many two-bay NAS shoppers.

Related posts

QNAP TS-231P Two-Bay SOHO NAS Reviewed

QNAP's TS-231P is a good value in a RAID 1 NAS.

QNAP TS-x20 NAS Series Reviewed

QNAP's TS-x20 NAS series looks like a better deal than its more expensive TS-x21 family.

Maxtor Central Axis Reviewed

Maxtor's Central Axis packs good performance, big capacity and easy-to-use remote Web access into a small, right-priced package.