|At a Glance|
|Product||D-Link DCS-5020L [Website]|
|Summary||mydlink-enabled pan and tilt Day/Night Network Camera|
|Pros||• Best night vision we've tested to date
• Great wireless range
• Hosted portal for remote viewing
• Great value for the price
|Cons||• No recording to SD card, but you are notified at network loss
• No recording to share
• Not HD
We're starting to put together quite a little database of day and night images from different network surveillance cameras we've reviewed. Some rather impressive, some not so much. What has really surprised me with each review is that the camera's price does not necessarily indicate its quality.
The subject of today's review, D-Link's DCS-5020L, is relatively inexpensive. But it really surprised me with how good certain aspects of it are. Especially considering the other D-Link cameras we've looked at have been just "ok".
Opening the package finds the DCS-5020L, a long wall wart power adapter with lengthy cable, flat CAT5 cable, quick install quide, mounting templates, mounting hardware and mounting bracket.
The DCS-5020L supports both 10/100 Ethernet and 802.11 b/g/n wireless network connections. For sake of disclosure, all of the tests run on this camera were using wireless. I ran initial setup using D-Link's Setup Wizard. Once through with the wizard, I simply pushed the WPS button on the DCS-5020L and on my router and disconnected Ethernet once the WPS light quit flashing. It was that easy.
I've included some of the DCS-5020L's key features below.
- Chipset - Ralink RT3352F - MAC, 2.4Ghz radio, ethernet and CPU
- SDRAM - 64 MB
- Flash - 8 MB
- Microphone - Yes
- Speaker - No
- Wireless - 802.11 b/g/n w/ WEP/WPA/WPA2 and WPS
- Ethernet - 10/100
- PoE - No
Video and Lens
- Lens - Focal length: 2.2 mm, F2.0
- Horizontal viewing angle - 66 degrees
- Pan/Tilt - Yes, motorized
- Zoom - Digital, up to 4x
- Video codecs - H.264, MJPEG, JPEG for still images
- Max resolution - 640 x 480 up to 30 fps
- IR LEDs - 10 LEDs, 8 meter claimed distance
- Remote viewing - Yes, hosted portal
- Motion Detection - Yes
- Sound Detection - Yes
- Email notifications - Yes, still images and clips
- Text notification - No
- Record to share - No
- Record to FTP - Yes
- Record to SD - No
- App support - Android and iOS
I was wary of taking the DCS-5020L apart just for the fact of the pan and tilt. So I decided to look at the FCC site to see if there was clear documentation of the chipset. In fact there was, in the image below we can clearly see the Ralink RT3352F router-on-a-chip, so named because it involves everything needed to run on one single chip, including the MAC, 2.4 GHz radio, Ethernet and CPU.
Ralink RT3352F router-on-a-chip chipset
This could be a blessing or a curse, depending on how well everything worked, and I intended to find out. One feature I was eager to test given the router-on-a-chip configuration was the "Wireless Extender" that D-Link has added to this camera in order to extend wireless range for more IP cameras. The Wireless Extender allows you to connect up to five wireless devices, either keeping the original SSID or creating a new one. The configuration options you'll find for the Wireless Extender are shown in the image below.
Wireless Extender functionality
Given that one chipset handled everything, I was eager to see what happened to framerate on the camera's image once clients started connecting. To test, I installed the mydlink Lite app onto my Android phone. D-Link provides the Lite app for free, which lets you view one camera at a time. But the company charges you $0.99 for the mydlink+ app which lets you view four mydlink cameras at once. I still don't understand vendors charging something as paultry as $0.99 for an app that should be included with your purchase, but I'm getting off-topic.
Once I had mydlink Lite installed, I checked the framerate and found 30fps at 640 x 480, perfect. I then connected my Android phone to the DCS-5020L's extender. I also connected my laptop to the camera's extender and VPN'ed into work, all while watching the framerate and picture. Framerate stayed responsive and high. The pan and tilt features were never particularly snappy through the mydlink hosted portal, but they were using IPCam Viewer locally.
The Wireless Extender functionality worked well and impressed me. I'm not sure I would use it, I couldn't test reliability over the long-term with the setup. It does halve your bandwidth as one radio is used for sending and receiving, but it's there. When I checked Amazon reviews for the camera, many of the negative reviews were regarding the wireless functionality. My testing did not reveal problems and actually revealed very good wireless range. I moved the camera outside, to a place where my phone and laptop can't connect to my wireless anymore and connection was still sound on the camera. The Wireless Extender even worked well out there.
Related Items:D-Link Shipping IP Camera Quartet
Y-Cam HomeMonitor Reviewed
D-Link DCS-2310L Outdoor HD Cloud Camera Reviewed
D-Link Releases Pretty Inexpensive Pan / Tilt Network Cam
D-Link Announces Cloud Camera 5000 with Pan and Tilt Functions
Average user rating from: 1 user(s)
NOTE! Please post product reviews from actual experience only.
Questions, review comments and opinions about products not based on actual use will not be published.
|User Rating [Back to Top]||Overall:||4.3||Features :||4.0||Performance :||5.0||Reliability :||4.0|
Decent home monitoring solution....
February 10, 2014
Report this review
I recently was testing out the DCS-5020L, and also have the DCS-942L. I was also disappointed that the 5020L does not natively stream to a network share like the 942L will do, however you can get the same effect sending video to a share via FTP if your storage device supports it.
I have an Iomega StorCentre ix2-dl, because it supports IP cameras for streaming storage, and while the DCS-942L is not in the supported camera list, it will work with the ix2-dl surveillance application, however the DCS-5020L does not. Yet, I can still set up a share on the ix2-dl and then constantly stream the 5020L's video to that share via FTP.
Rather than three-minute 80+MB files that the 942L streams, I get a series of 15-second clips from the 5020L. If you had to do a bunch of reviewing, you could always splice a dozen of them together to get the same stream length as the 942L. On the other hand, I get photo notification when motion is detected from either camera, and therefore can simply go straight to the relevant clip(s) based on the image time stamp if necessary.
When you look at 24-hrs worth of video, there is no size difference between the two methods. I am not sure if there is a greater bandwidth cost to streaming to the server via FTP rather than the RTSP that I think the 942L uses, however I have not noticed any differences on the home network performance between using the 942L RTSP and the 5020L FTP.